CQC Caring: what it means under the Single Assessment Framework and how to achieve a Good or Outstanding rating

The CQC Caring key question assesses whether the people your homecare service supports are treated with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect. Since April 2024, the CQC has operated under the Single Assessment Framework, which replaced the previous Key Lines of Enquiry (KLOE) system with a new set of quality statements.

‍

For registered managers and homecare leaders, evidencing Caring well is not optional: a weak rating in this area affects your overall score and, more importantly, signals that the people you support are not consistently receiving the standard of care they deserve.

‍

This guide covers the five Caring quality statements assessed for homecare services, what inspectors are looking for when assigning a Good or Outstanding rating, and the practical steps that make the difference between a service that claims to care and one that can prove it.

‍

What does the CQC mean by 'Caring' under the Single Assessment Framework?

‍

Under the Single Assessment Framework, Caring is one of the CQC's five key questions alongside Safe, Effective, Responsive and Well-led. Each key question is assessed through quality statements, written from the provider's perspective as 'we statements', which describe what good and outstanding care delivery looks like in practice. The CQC defines Caring as a service that involves and treats people with compassion, kindness, dignity and respect.

‍

For homecare and shared lives services, the Caring key question has five quality statements: Kindness, compassion and dignity; Treating people as individuals; Independence, choice and control; Responding to people's immediate needs; and Workforce wellbeing and enablement. Not every statement will be assessed at every inspection. The CQC selects quality statements based on risk and sector priorities, and the average inspection covers around nine or ten statements across all five key questions. That said, the first three Caring statements are directly observable during any site visit and feature consistently in homecare assessments.

‍

Evidence is gathered across six categories: people's experiences, staff and leader feedback, feedback from partners, direct observation, processes, and outcomes. For the Caring statements, people's experience and direct observation carry particular weight. Inspectors want to hear from the people you support and see how your carers actually behave during visits, not simply review your policies.

‍

Quality statement 1: Kindness, compassion and dignity

‍

The first quality statement requires that staff always treat people with kindness, empathy and compassion, and that they respect each person's privacy and dignity. For a Good or Outstanding rating, you need more than a values statement on your website. Inspectors look for consistent, documented evidence that staff demonstrate this in every interaction, not only when they know they are being observed.

‍

Evidence comes from multiple directions. Inspectors will speak with clients and families directly, review care records for qualitative observations about emotional and psychological wellbeing, and observe carers at work during site visits. Training records should show that staff receive specific input on dignity in care, empathy and respectful communication, with practical assessments as well as completion certificates. For a full breakdown of CQC mandatory training requirements, including equality and diversity training, the Birdie blog covers what providers are expected to deliver. Skills for Care also publishes practical guidance on what Good and Outstanding evidence looks like for each quality statement.

‍

A service aiming for Outstanding needs to show how it addresses the Equality Act 2010 protected characteristics in practice, not just in policy. This means demonstrating that staff identify and actively respond to each person's individual needs related to age, disability, ethnicity, gender, religion and other characteristics. Regular supervision sessions should include direct observations of care interactions, with clear records showing you're maintaining and improving a culture of dignity and respect throughout your team.

‍

Quality statement 2: Treating people as individuals

‍

The second quality statement focuses on knowing the person behind the care needs. It requires services to identify and respond to each person's strengths, interests, cultural background, religious beliefs and individual circumstances. This is where person-centred care moves from a phrase in a policy document to something that can be evidenced clearly during an inspection.

‍

For homecare providers, the most effective way to demonstrate this is through detailed client profiles that go well beyond medical history and task lists. Birdie's About Me profile captures exactly this kind of information: a person's routines, hobbies, important life history, communication preferences, and how they like to be addressed. Carers can access this before a visit, which helps them build rapport quickly and deliver care that feels personal rather than procedural. A client who spent their career as a musician might want that part of their identity acknowledged; a client with strong religious beliefs will want those respected as a matter of course. Knowing this before arriving at the door is the difference between a visit that feels genuinely caring and one that feels clinical.

‍

Matching carers to clients based on personality, communication style and shared interests is another strong evidence point for this quality statement. Where you make these decisions thoughtfully, document the reasoning and gather feedback from clients on how the relationship is working. Christies Care, which achieved an Outstanding CQC rating, describes how Birdie's person-centred tools helped them demonstrate this approach systematically. Inspectors looking for Outstanding will want to see this level of intentionality, not just logistical efficiency.

‍

Quality statement 3: Independence, choice and control

‍

The third quality statement asks providers to actively promote people's independence, not just work around it. The CQC expects care plans to reflect what individuals can do and to give them genuine control over how their care is delivered, not simply record a list of tasks a carer will complete on their behalf.

‍

In practice, this means co-producing care plans with the individual and, where appropriate, with their family. Choices should be clearly documented and revisited regularly, with updates made promptly when preferences change. Birdie's platform operates as a live working document: updates made by care managers are reflected in real time for carers in the field, so the care being delivered is always aligned with what the client has actually agreed to.

‍

Families can stay informed and involved through the Birdie Care Circle app, which gives authorised family members visibility of care logs, observations and wellbeing notes. This level of transparency directly supports the involvement and openness the CQC expects to see under this quality statement.

‍

Communication needs are central here. Under the Accessible Information Standard, providers have a legal duty to record and meet individuals' communication needs, whether that means large print, a specific language, or support from an advocate. Where a client lacks capacity to make particular decisions, you must show clearly how you're applying the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and working with advocates or family members to support the person's best interests. The CQC views signposting to advocacy services not as an admission of difficulty, but as evidence that a service understands its responsibilities.

‍

Responding to immediate needs and supporting your workforce

‍

Two further quality statements round out the Caring key question and are worth specific attention in inspection preparation. The first, Responding to people's immediate needs, examines how your service identifies and acts on changes in a person's condition, pain or emotional state during visits. Inspectors want evidence that carers have the time, training and tools to notice changes and respond appropriately, and that concerns are escalated to the right people without delay. Birdie's real-time alert system allows carers to flag concerns during or immediately after a visit, creating a complete audit trail that shows how and when those concerns were identified, escalated and resolved. This kind of structured responsiveness is difficult to demonstrate through paper-based systems.

‍

The second, Workforce wellbeing and enablement, reflects the CQC's view that staff who feel supported, valued and listened to are better placed to deliver consistently compassionate care. This means evidencing how your service supports staff mental health and wellbeing, acts on their feedback, provides regular supervision and development, and maintains a culture where people feel able to raise concerns. Skills for Care has consistently highlighted the relationship between staff wellbeing, retention and care quality, which makes workforce support a direct input into your Caring rating rather than a separate HR concern.

‍

Common barriers to a Good or Outstanding Caring rating

‍

Most providers who fall short on Caring do so not because their staff are unkind, but because the evidence is not there when inspectors look for it. Care that is genuinely compassionate but poorly documented does not produce the audit trail needed to support a high score. This is the most common gap: a service where carers clearly care about their clients, but where the systems for recording, monitoring and evidencing that care are underdeveloped.

‍

Inconsistency across the staff team is another frequent issue. A homecare service might have several outstanding carers alongside others who receive less support and development. Without regular structured observation, meaningful supervision and feedback mechanisms, managers may not identify the gap until an inspection surfaces it. The CQC considers the experience of everyone it speaks to, not just the most satisfied. A recurring pattern of feedback describing rushed visits or carers who don't take time to engage meaningfully can weaken a Caring rating even where the majority of staff are performing well.

‍

Other barriers include visit times that are too short to allow genuine relationship building; client profiles that are incomplete or not used by carers before visits; and a failure to use or signpost to advocacy services when a client or family member cannot resolve a concern internally. The CQC views these patterns as indicators of a service's wider culture. Where they appear, they suggest an organisation that has prioritised operational efficiency over the quality of human interaction, which is precisely what the Caring key question is designed to assess.

‍

Achieving a Good or Outstanding rating for CQC Caring is not primarily about what your policies say. It's about whether the people your service supports consistently experience kindness, dignity and respect, and whether you can demonstrate that through structured, reliable evidence. That means having the right foundations in place: person-centred profiles that carers genuinely use before every visit, care plans co-produced with clients and updated in real time, tools for recording observations and escalating concerns promptly, and a supervision culture that maintains consistency across your whole team.

‍

If you're preparing for an upcoming inspection or looking to understand where your current approach has gaps, Birdie's care quality platform is built to help homecare providers evidence their quality across every CQC key question. You can also explore how Azure Care moved from Good to Outstanding, or how Britannia Homecare successfully turned around a Requires Improvement rating, to see what consistently good care delivery looks like in practice.

‍